翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Secondary mutation
・ Secondary notation
・ Secondary orality
・ Secondary organic aerosols
・ Secondary palate
・ Secondary palate development
・ Secondary payload
・ Secondary plot
・ Secondary plot (kinetics)
・ Secondary poisoning
・ Secondary polynomials
・ Secondary poverty
・ Secondary predicate
・ Secondary products revolution
・ Secondary Protocol
Secondary reference
・ Secondary research
・ Secondary school
・ Secondary School Admission Test
・ Secondary School Admission Test Board
・ Secondary School Certificate
・ Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum Improvement Study
・ Secondary School of Doane
・ Secondary school of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
・ Secondary school of mechanical engineering, Novi Sad
・ Secondary School Reform (Prince George's County)
・ Secondary sclerosing cholangitis
・ Secondary sector of the economy
・ Secondary Security Screening Selection
・ Secondary sensory endings


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Secondary reference : ウィキペディア英語版
Secondary reference
Secondary reference points to the representation as a necessary part in granting a meaning to a (part of a) sentence. In this approach, words that don’t contribute to the representation are void; they can only provide a figurative expression. Examples of phrases which lack a secondary reference are 'a black Monday' (unless it is used figuratively) and Bernard Bolzano's 'round quadrangle'. Alexius Meinong's Types of objects can be mentioned here, too.
In the first case, one may have a representation of a Monday (or at least of something one calls a Monday), as well as of something black, but not of a 'black Monday', since these qualities don’t combine ('Monday' being too abstract to be combined with a concrete quality such as a color). In the second case, there is an incongruity: a quadrangle can be represented, but not a round one; conversely, there can be a circle, but it can’t be square. It may, therefore, be debated whether a representation is created here.
Another example is presented by George Berkeley. He says: "() Does it not require some pains and skill to form the general idea of a triangle (which is yet none of the most abstract, comprehensive and difficult) for it must be neither oblique nor rectangle, neither equilateral, equicrural, nor scalenon, but ''all and none'' of these at once?" (''A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge'', Introduction, section 13.) Berkeley is here criticizing John Locke, demonstrating that each representation is particular (i.e., individual).
Whether there is a meaning or not depends on the individual person: it is possible that a sentence has a meaning according to A, whereas B can’t discern any. This may, e.g., result from relevant knowledge which A possesses and B lacks, as in the case where one should decide the answer to the question 'Is 15 a prime number?' and A knows what a prime number is and B doesn’t; the sentence then doesn’t have a meaning for B.
==Literature==

*J. Doomen, "The Individuality of Meaning", in ''Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations'' vol. 5, no. 1 (Sept. 2006), pp. 121-135 (first occurrence of the term)

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Secondary reference」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.